Research
Dr Phil Parker’s research and development of approaches using the link between the brain, mind and body have been of great interest in the research world.
This page presents highlights of Phil’s research and the research of others into his work. Links are provided to the full papers.
CFS/ME Research
A Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is the best kind of study available designed to show if something is effective and safe or not. This one was run by the NHS and the University of Bristol, it found that the LP improved CFS/ME patients’ symptoms of physical function and fatigue and had no side effects, when added to NHS treatment for CFS/ME. The positive changes also continued for the entire 12-month study.
Long COVID Research
The LP has also been used to help those with Long COVID. Three separate peer-reviewed papers reported on an audit of the LP three different case reports. Patients reported improvements in fatigue and other symptoms after completing the LP.
The Audit concludes:’the lightning process is a promising and safe intervention for symptoms of long COVID. Primary care clinicians can refer patients for treatment with a high chance of benefit without fear of harm.
View the full the Audit here >>>
Post-Cancer Fatigue Research
A pilot study in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors found that the LP led to significant reductions in fatigue, depression, and anxiety. Participants also reported improvements in their energy levels and quality of life.
Comparing LP to NHS Approaches Research
UK specialist medical care (SMC) for paediatric Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS/ME) includes behavioural approaches (Graded Exercise Therapy; Activity Management) and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for fatigue (CBT-F). Treatment is suboptimal with a third of children not recovering after 6 months of SMC. Many families seek alternative treatments at personal cost, including the Lightning Process (LP). Evidence shows LP can improve patient outcomes, though this intervention is not widely known/understood.
Results:Â While overlaps with SMC approaches were identified, and CBT-F in particular, distinct elements of LP were its focus on language style, neurophysiological rationale, affective/physiological change technique and mode of delivery.
Comparing LP to Treatment as Usual for Substance Use
An RCT found the LP helped those with substance use significantly reduced alcohol use and impulsivity, and increased flourishing scores compared to treatment as usual. The positive changes also continued for the entire 3-month study.
A study exploring the experiences of those taking the LP to help with substance use issues found it was described as an empowering, compassionate and effective approach.
View the full qualitative study here >>>